|
Size: 838
Comment:
|
Size: 6509
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| == Developer Evaluation == | = Developer Evaluation = |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| In February 2006 we asked the developers from the BRIDGES and DyVOSE projects to answer a few brief questions. Contact details confirmed at http://www.nesc.ac.uk/nesc/team.html with biographies. | In February 2006 we asked the developers from the BRIDGES and DyVOSE projects to answer a few brief questions. Contact details confirmed at http://www.nesc.ac.uk/nesc/team.html with biographies. We asked the developers to considering specifically the Shibbolizing of the Bridges web portal and DyVOSE work, and all the myriad of steps which had to be completed to make this work (PERMIS, whatever), and asked them to please identify for us: 1. what did you find difficult? 1. what makes Shibboleth a good solution for accessing a service like Bridges or the DyVOSE data? 1. what issues can you see in a real-world production of this with 100s of users, maybe a commercial data provider, issues for the future etc.? 1. what scalability issues can you identify? 1. how could the access control you've implemented be subverted by e.g. a bad person, or by an expert trying to get round the system for their own convenience, or by a careless user? |
| Line 5: | Line 10: |
| We used the "naively"-formed scenario: | To spark some real-world flavour we used the "naively"-formed scenario: |
| Line 14: | Line 20: |
| == Responses Received == | = Responses Received = |
| Line 18: | Line 24: |
| * Micha Bayer (ROS: '''Grid/BLAST person and portlets, globus''') | * Micha Bayer * (ROS: ''Grid/BLAST person and portlets, globus'') * Micha: ''Please do bear in mind that I was only involved in this peripherally - I wrote the gridblast portlet and service which Jipu then continued to Shib-enable, so my knowledge of Shib is very limited indeed.'' |
| Line 25: | Line 33: |
| === | = Results = ||'''Question''' || '''Developer''' || '''Answer''' || ||'''1. what did you find difficult?''' || || || || || Oluwafemi Ajayi || || || || Micha Bayer || can't really comment as I was not involved in Shib-specific functionality || || || Jipu Jiang || || || || Anthony Stell || || || || John Watt || || ||'''2. what makes Shibboleth a good solution for accessing a service like Bridges or the DyVOSE data?''' || || || || || Oluwafemi Ajayi || || || || Micha Bayer || It looks quite promising to me, especially for a academia-type environment where we would want to, say, give access to an application for anyone in Scotland as part of a Scottish grid. We would then not have to worry about managing our own user base but instead have arrangements with all other Scottish unis etc. This obviously relies on us being able to trace user activity and user origin/details, for example because NGS as a an end resource dictates this to us under the existing agreement. So as long as we can extract a user's DN programmatically from whithin the portal (can we?) it would be a good solution for us. That way offending users could be tracked and hopefully dealt with at their home institution. || || || Jipu Jiang || || || || Anthony Stell || || || || John Watt || || ||'''3. what issues can you see in a real-world production of this with 100s of users, maybe a commercial data provider, issues for the future etc.?''' || || || || || Oluwafemi Ajayi || || || || Micha Bayer || as in my previous point -- can't think of anything else just now || || || Jipu Jiang || || || || Anthony Stell || || || || John Watt || || ||'''4. what scalability issues can you identify?''' || || || || || Oluwafemi Ajayi || || || || Micha Bayer || || || || Jipu Jiang || || || || Anthony Stell || || || || John Watt || || ||'''5. how could the access control you've implemented be subverted by e.g. a bad person, or by an expert trying to get round the system for their own convenience, or by a careless user?''' || || || || || Oluwafemi Ajayi || || || || Micha Bayer || || || || Jipu Jiang || || || || Anthony Stell || || || || John Watt || || ||Mon 1 May ||<-2 :> '''Final doc.s to JISC''' || |
Developer Evaluation
In February 2006 we asked the developers from the BRIDGES and DyVOSE projects to answer a few brief questions. Contact details confirmed at http://www.nesc.ac.uk/nesc/team.html with biographies. We asked the developers to considering specifically the Shibbolizing of the Bridges web portal and DyVOSE work, and all the myriad of steps which had to be completed to make this work (PERMIS, whatever), and asked them to please identify for us:
- what did you find difficult?
- what makes Shibboleth a good solution for accessing a service like Bridges or the DyVOSE data?
- what issues can you see in a real-world production of this with 100s of users, maybe a commercial data provider, issues for the future etc.?
- what scalability issues can you identify?
- how could the access control you've implemented be subverted by e.g. a bad person, or by an expert trying to get round the system for their own convenience, or by a careless user?
To spark some real-world flavour we used the "naively"-formed scenario:
To the developer: Scenario: Please imagine you've by chance met a manager of a faculty resource in the corridor, and he/she knows of your experience and naively thinks you're the person who can just Shibb their target - "This afternoon, if you've time?"
Responses Received
We are extremely grateful to the following for responding so promptly to our scenario:
- Oluwafemi Ajayi
- Micha Bayer
(ROS: Grid/BLAST person and portlets, globus)
Micha: Please do bear in mind that I was only involved in this peripherally - I wrote the gridblast portlet and service which Jipu then continued to Shib-enable, so my knowledge of Shib is very limited indeed.
- Jipu Jiang
- Anthony Stell
- John Watt
The results can be seen below.
Results
Question |
Developer |
Answer |
1. what did you find difficult? |
|
|
|
Oluwafemi Ajayi |
|
|
Micha Bayer |
can't really comment as I was not involved in Shib-specific functionality |
|
Jipu Jiang |
|
|
Anthony Stell |
|
|
John Watt |
|
2. what makes Shibboleth a good solution for accessing a service like Bridges or the DyVOSE data? |
|
|
|
Oluwafemi Ajayi |
|
|
Micha Bayer |
It looks quite promising to me, especially for a academia-type environment where we would want to, say, give access to an application for anyone in Scotland as part of a Scottish grid. We would then not have to worry about managing our own user base but instead have arrangements with all other Scottish unis etc. This obviously relies on us being able to trace user activity and user origin/details, for example because NGS as a an end resource dictates this to us under the existing agreement. So as long as we can extract a user's DN programmatically from whithin the portal (can we?) it would be a good solution for us. That way offending users could be tracked and hopefully dealt with at their home institution. |
|
Jipu Jiang |
|
|
Anthony Stell |
|
|
John Watt |
|
3. what issues can you see in a real-world production of this with 100s of users, maybe a commercial data provider, issues for the future etc.? |
|
|
|
Oluwafemi Ajayi |
|
|
Micha Bayer |
as in my previous point -- can't think of anything else just now |
|
Jipu Jiang |
|
|
Anthony Stell |
|
|
John Watt |
|
4. what scalability issues can you identify? |
|
|
|
Oluwafemi Ajayi |
|
|
Micha Bayer |
|
|
Jipu Jiang |
|
|
Anthony Stell |
|
|
John Watt |
|
5. how could the access control you've implemented be subverted by e.g. a bad person, or by an expert trying to get round the system for their own convenience, or by a careless user? |
|
|
|
Oluwafemi Ajayi |
|
|
Micha Bayer |
|
|
Jipu Jiang |
|
|
Anthony Stell |
|
|
John Watt |
|
Mon 1 May |
Final doc.s to JISC |
|