Differences between revisions 2 and 7 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2006-05-24 22:25:32
Size: 2613
Editor: AndrewMartin
Comment: Very rough version
Revision 7 as of 2013-05-17 16:26:45
Size: 2895
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
Present: Andrew Martin, Kang Tang, Matt Viljoen, David Spence.  Present: Andrew Martin, David Spence, Kang Tang, Matt Viljoen.
Line 9: Line 9:
= Notes of Previous Meeting =
Line 10: Line 11:
Meeting in progress... Filed as: ShibGridMtg9Mar
Line 12: Line 13:
APM To note:

 1. David Meredith is in this group, working on a shibbolized portal, but based at Daresbury. Line manager Andy Richards. '''Action Mat to find out how much time he will spend on this work.'''

 David should be invited to project AG meetings.

 1.#2 Credential lifetimes is a complex issue. Shib credentials are typically one-hour long; poor match for multiple-day proxy certs. etc. The mapping must clearly be subject to some policy. Where does that policy sit? Is it up to the SP to decide? What is Manchester's view? More research is needed.

 3. IB requirements: IB has a portalusing mod_shib Apache plug-in. '''Action: David to contact Matthew Mascord to find out more.'''

= Progress =

Kang Tang started at Oxford this week.

David has worked on MyProxy and a Shibbolized Proxy upload. Establised a semi-production IdP at RAL. An architecture document describes attributes and how they turn into attributes at DN.

Does Oxford IdP issue the same attributes (do names need changing?). Should we set up a simple version for the project? Solving Oxford's IdP issues is out of scope. But we want a near-production facility. '''Action: Kang to investigate.'''

== Wiki ==

Everyone seems happy to use the ESP-Grid Wiki, provided:

 * either the open access for editing is restricted, or there is good version control, or both.
 * we establish a better structure for ShibGrid
 * files can be uploaded.

'''Action: Andrew check with Mark.'''

== Architecture Document ==

David has produced an outline architecture and implemented a prototype. A SSO myProxy server is deployed at RAL already. How many myProxy servers are needed? Just one? Logically, you would allow a choice, but we need not bother for now. Organisationally, the myProxy server is part of the NGS, along with the portal. Other services could use it if authorized.

You could call out from myProxy to VOMS, and so get role in certificate. This is an optional extra step.
Line 15: Line 48:
reviewed notes

Person at Daresbury working on a shibbolized portal.
       additional to this project?
       should be invited to AG meetings

cert. lifetimes

      shib = 1hr credential lifetime
      could get IdP to set up lifetime

      this is a max lifetime
      user could theoretically set a shorter one
      
      myProxy allows up to the max lifetime

      is it up to SP to decide

      what is Manchester's view?

      where should policy sit?

      maybe post to shibgrid mailing list

IB reqs: IB portal David??
portal using mod_shib apache plug-in
David to contact Matthew Mascord

--
David done work on MyProxy
shibbolized proxy upload

establised semi-production IdP at RAL

arch document describes attributes and how they turn in to attributes at DN

Action on Kang: IdP in Oxofrd.
   does it issue the same attributes
        (do names need changing?)
        
        could set up simple version for project
 not in scope to sort out properly.

gsi-ssh

no need to talk to Rob. David Meredith is in this group, but based at
Daresbury. Line manager Andy Richards. Action Mat to find out how
much time to spend on this work.

Wiki. Happy to use.
       check on version control
       limit edit access??
       action APM - talk to mark
       establish a bit more structure

       or get a better wiki
       can files be uploaded

=============

arch doc
= Next Steps =
Line 78: Line 51:
 1. We should circulate the meeting notes from GGF15 (Athens); check where we are, relative to other projects.
Line 79: Line 53:
david has a prototype.
sso myproxy server deployed at RAL already
    java-ssh client...
 2. It will soon be time to discuss with OMII about s/w quality. We should also consider making provision for security evaluation.
Line 83: Line 55:
===  3. Getting requirements sorted out and written up is key.
Line 85: Line 57:
second use case. benefits of long-lived credentials.  4. Progress with the project plan is urgently needed.
Line 87: Line 59:
===  5. Kang to start meeting with David regularly.
Line 89: Line 61:
myProxy. just one.

choose? logically, allow choice, but not bother for now.

Organisationally, it's part of NGS, with portal.
Other services could use it if authorized.

==
could call out from myProxy to VOMS. so get role in certificate.
optional extra step

===

notes from GGF to circulate. check where we are relative to other projects

===

discuss with OMII about s/w quality
also with security evaluation

====

getting requirements sorted out and written up is key.

====

aim for first week of may. on AG.

===

Kang Tang to meet with David from end next week. Thurs?
Next meeting: aim for first week of may. on AG.

ShibGrid Project Meeting Notes

12th April 2006 at RAL

Present: Andrew Martin, David Spence, Kang Tang, Matt Viljoen.

[Apologies: I have written these notes up too late. And my browser crashed while I was doing so, loosing one set of edits. As such, they are now a poor record of the meeting. --Andrew]

Notes of Previous Meeting

Filed as: ShibGridMtg9Mar

To note:

  1. David Meredith is in this group, working on a shibbolized portal, but based at Daresbury. Line manager Andy Richards. Action Mat to find out how much time he will spend on this work. David should be invited to project AG meetings.

  2. Credential lifetimes is a complex issue. Shib credentials are typically one-hour long; poor match for multiple-day proxy certs. etc. The mapping must clearly be subject to some policy. Where does that policy sit? Is it up to the SP to decide? What is Manchester's view? More research is needed.
  3. IB requirements: IB has a portalusing mod_shib Apache plug-in. Action: David to contact Matthew Mascord to find out more.

Progress

Kang Tang started at Oxford this week.

David has worked on MyProxy and a Shibbolized Proxy upload. Establised a semi-production IdP at RAL. An architecture document describes attributes and how they turn into attributes at DN.

Does Oxford IdP issue the same attributes (do names need changing?). Should we set up a simple version for the project? Solving Oxford's IdP issues is out of scope. But we want a near-production facility. Action: Kang to investigate.

Wiki

Everyone seems happy to use the ESP-Grid Wiki, provided:

  • either the open access for editing is restricted, or there is good version control, or both.
  • we establish a better structure for ShibGrid

  • files can be uploaded.

Action: Andrew check with Mark.

Architecture Document

David has produced an outline architecture and implemented a prototype. A SSO myProxy server is deployed at RAL already. How many myProxy servers are needed? Just one? Logically, you would allow a choice, but we need not bother for now. Organisationally, the myProxy server is part of the NGS, along with the portal. Other services could use it if authorized.

You could call out from myProxy to VOMS, and so get role in certificate. This is an optional extra step.

Next Steps

  1. We should circulate the meeting notes from GGF15 (Athens); check where we are, relative to other projects.
  2. It will soon be time to discuss with OMII about s/w quality. We should also consider making provision for security evaluation.
  3. Getting requirements sorted out and written up is key.
  4. Progress with the project plan is urgently needed.
  5. Kang to start meeting with David regularly.

Next meeting: aim for first week of may. on AG.

ESPGRIDwiki: ShibGridMtg12Apr (last edited 2013-05-17 16:26:45 by localhost)