Differences between revisions 17 and 18
⇤ ← Revision 17 as of 2006-10-30 12:40:59 →
Size: 1738
Editor: KatharineLindsay
Comment:
← Revision 18 as of 2006-10-30 12:43:10 → ⇥
Size: 1944
Editor: KatharineLindsay
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
 * Suggestions for LTG
 * Suggestions for Marketing
The following suggestions have been put forwards collaboratively by the CRT and various groups on discussion of this study's findings.

 * Suggestions from the LTG
 * Suggestions from the Marketing Committee
 * Suggestions from the OxTalent Committee

To be able to support and enhance university teaching with ICTs we must first find out how academics are currently teaching their subjects, and why they teach in certain ways. To be able to embed technology sucessfully within teaching and learning we must understand how teachers' experience and perceive teaching, learning, ICTs, and the mesh of factors that motivate them to adopt, or not to adopt technology.

The aim of this study was to identify some core themes that are of significance when implementing ICTs in university teaching, and in doing so be able to respond to needs, gather requirements, alleviate fears, and illuminate the benefits of using ICTs in teaching and learning.

Reports

This has been an exploratory study and the following reports discuss the findings of the research. It is up to the individual to determine what possible outcomes may result from these findings.

  • [:CRT.Report.Connecting technology and university teaching:Summary Report (Wiki page)] This report is a wiki page which is hyperlinked to interview summaries and explanations about the various methodologies used.

  • [attachment:ConnetIT_SummaryReport Summary Report (PDF)]

  • Full Report (PDF)

Data

  • Interview summaries for this project can be found in the [:CRT.Interview Summaries:CRT data store]

  • Full transcripts of interviews conducted are available upon request from Kate Lindsay.

Outcomes

The following suggestions have been put forwards collaboratively by the CRT and various groups on discussion of this study's findings.

  • Suggestions from the LTG
  • Suggestions from the Marketing Committee

  • Suggestions from the OxTalent Committee

Other Outputs

  • [attachment:ConnectIT_presentation Powerpoint Presentation]
  • Paper for the m-ictce conference
  • Paper for SRHE conference
  • [:CRT.A History of E-learning at Oxford University :History of e-learning at Oxford University]