Differences between revisions 20 and 21
⇤ ← Revision 20 as of 2006-10-30 12:49:05 →
Size: 2053
Editor: KatharineLindsay
Comment:
← Revision 21 as of 2006-10-31 11:00:44 → ⇥
Size: 2470
Editor: KatharineLindsay
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
 * Full Report (PDF)
== Data ==		  * [attachment:ConnectIT%5Ffullreport Full Report (PDF)] The full report contains a full literature review and a detailed methodological discussion. This report was presented to the Department of Educational Studies, Oxford University, in part fulfillment of the researcher's MSc thesis in Educational Research Methodology.
== Research Data ==
Line 20: Line 20:
== Worktasks determined from this research ==
Line 21: Line 22:
 * [:CRT.A History of E-learning at Oxford University :History of e-learning at Oxford University]
Line 22: Line 24:
 * Paper for the m-ictce conference
 * Paper for SRHE conference
 * [:CRT.A History of E-learning at Oxford University :History of e-learning at Oxford University]		  * Paper presented at the M-ictce conference
 * Paper presented at the SRHE conference
 * Article in  the Oxford Magazine

To be able to support and enhance university teaching with ICTs we must first find out how academics are currently teaching their subjects, and why they teach in certain ways. To be able to embed technology sucessfully within teaching and learning we must understand how teachers' experience and perceive teaching, learning, ICTs, and the mesh of factors that motivate them to adopt, or not to adopt technology.

The aim of this study was to identify some core themes that are of significance when implementing ICTs in university teaching, and in doing so be able to respond to needs, gather requirements, alleviate fears, and illuminate the benefits of using ICTs in teaching and learning.

Reports

This has been an exploratory study and the following reports discuss the findings of the research. It is up to the individual to determine what possible outcomes may result from these findings.

  • [:CRT.Report.Connecting technology and university teaching:Summary Report (Wiki page)] This report is a wiki page which is hyperlinked to interview summaries and explanations about the various methodologies used.

  • [attachment:ConnetIT_SummaryReport Summary Report (PDF)]

  • [attachment:ConnectIT%5Ffullreport Full Report (PDF)] The full report contains a full literature review and a detailed methodological discussion. This report was presented to the Department of Educational Studies, Oxford University, in part fulfillment of the researcher's MSc thesis in Educational Research Methodology.

Research Data

  • Interview summaries for this project can be found in the [:CRT.Interview Summaries:CRT data store]

  • Full transcripts of interviews conducted are available upon request from Kate Lindsay.

Discussion and suggestions

The findings of this study have been presented to various groups. Discussions resulting from these presentations have included a number of suggestions about how to actively enhance the use of technology within university teaching.

  • Suggestions from the LTG
  • Suggestions from the Marketing Committee

  • Suggestions from the OxTalent Committee

Worktasks determined from this research

Other Outputs

  • [:CRT.A History of E-learning at Oxford University :History of e-learning at Oxford University]
  • [attachment:ConnectIT_presentation Powerpoint Presentation]
  • Paper presented at the M-ictce conference
  • Paper presented at the SRHE conference
  • Article in the Oxford Magazine