Differences between revisions 1 and 6 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2006-10-29 17:44:28
Size: 932
Editor: HowardNoble
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2006-10-29 17:50:44
Size: 957
Editor: HowardNoble
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
 = Description and Objectives = '''Contents'''
= Description and Objectives =
Line 3: Line 4:
#Is this a single tool or a suite of tools?
#What was the tool originally designed to do?
#What aims was it designed to meet?
#Has it been modified in any way to meet these aims?
 *Is this a single tool or a suite of tools?
 *What was the tool originally designed to do?
 *What aims was it designed to meet?
 *Has it been modified in any way to meet these aims?
Line 8: Line 9:
 = Technology and Development = = Technology and Development =
Line 10: Line 11:
#What was used to develop the tool?
#What platforms does the tool run on?
#What downloads/plug-ins does it require for use?
#How technology dependent is the tool?
 *What was used to develop the tool?
 *What platforms does the tool run on?
 *What downloads/plug-ins does it require for use?
 *How technology dependent is the tool?
Line 15: Line 16:
 = Interoperability and Standards =
#Does the tool conform to any standards? If yes, how has this been tested?
#How accessible is the tool? How has its accessibility been tested?
= Interoperability and Standards =
 *Does the tool conform to any standards? If yes, how has this been tested?
 *How accessible is the tool? How has its accessibility been tested?
Line 19: Line 20:
 = Usage = = Usage =
Line 21: Line 22:
#How has the tool been evaluated in terms of its usability?
#How has the tool been evaluated in terms of meeting its functionality or learning goals?
 *How has the tool been evaluated in terms of its usability?
 *How has the tool been evaluated in terms of meeting its functionality or learning goals?
Line 24: Line 25:
 = Future use = = Future use =
Line 26: Line 27:
#Can you think of any ways that the tool could be applied to other learning environments?
#Are there any future plans for development?
 *Can you think of any ways that the tool could be applied to other learning environments?
 *Are there any future plans for development?

Contents

Description and Objectives

  • Is this a single tool or a suite of tools?
  • What was the tool originally designed to do?
  • What aims was it designed to meet?
  • Has it been modified in any way to meet these aims?

Technology and Development

  • What was used to develop the tool?
  • What platforms does the tool run on?
  • What downloads/plug-ins does it require for use?
  • How technology dependent is the tool?

Interoperability and Standards

  • Does the tool conform to any standards? If yes, how has this been tested?
  • How accessible is the tool? How has its accessibility been tested?

Usage

  • How has the tool been evaluated in terms of its usability?
  • How has the tool been evaluated in terms of meeting its functionality or learning goals?

Future use

  • Can you think of any ways that the tool could be applied to other learning environments?
  • Are there any future plans for development?

LTGPublicWiki: CRT.Evaluation.Example_Projects.Tools.Tools_Interview_Scedule (last edited 2013-05-20 11:29:50 by localhost)