Differences between revisions 4 and 8 (spanning 4 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2006-10-29 17:48:58 →
Size: 927
Editor: HowardNoble
Comment:
← Revision 8 as of 2006-10-29 17:51:45 → ⇥
Size: 967
Editor: HowardNoble
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[TableOfContents(2)]]
Line 3: Line 5:
#Is this a single tool or a suite of tools?
#What was the tool originally designed to do?
#What aims was it designed to meet?
#Has it been modified in any way to meet these aims?		  *Is this a single tool or a suite of tools?
 *What was the tool originally designed to do?
 *What aims was it designed to meet?
 *Has it been modified in any way to meet these aims?
Line 10: Line 12:
#What was used to develop the tool?
#What platforms does the tool run on?
#What downloads/plug-ins does it require for use?
#How technology dependent is the tool?		  *What was used to develop the tool?
 *What platforms does the tool run on?
 *What downloads/plug-ins does it require for use?
 *How technology dependent is the tool?
Line 16: Line 18:
#Does the tool conform to any standards? If yes, how has this been tested?
#How accessible is the tool? How has its accessibility been tested?		  *Does the tool conform to any standards? If yes, how has this been tested?
 *How accessible is the tool? How has its accessibility been tested?
Line 21: Line 23:
#How has the tool been evaluated in terms of its usability?
#How has the tool been evaluated in terms of meeting its functionality or learning goals?		  *How has the tool been evaluated in terms of its usability?
 *How has the tool been evaluated in terms of meeting its functionality or learning goals?
Line 26: Line 28:
#Can you think of any ways that the tool could be applied to other learning environments?
#Are there any future plans for development?		  *Can you think of any ways that the tool could be applied to other learning environments?
 *Are there any future plans for development?

TableOfContents(2)

Description and Objectives

  • Is this a single tool or a suite of tools?
  • What was the tool originally designed to do?
  • What aims was it designed to meet?
  • Has it been modified in any way to meet these aims?

Technology and Development

  • What was used to develop the tool?
  • What platforms does the tool run on?
  • What downloads/plug-ins does it require for use?
  • How technology dependent is the tool?

Interoperability and Standards

  • Does the tool conform to any standards? If yes, how has this been tested?
  • How accessible is the tool? How has its accessibility been tested?

Usage

  • How has the tool been evaluated in terms of its usability?
  • How has the tool been evaluated in terms of meeting its functionality or learning goals?

Future use

  • Can you think of any ways that the tool could be applied to other learning environments?
  • Are there any future plans for development?

LTGPublicWiki: CRT.Evaluation.Example_Projects.Tools.Tools_Interview_Scedule (last edited 2013-05-20 11:29:50 by localhost)