Differences between revisions 1 and 8 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2006-10-26 17:23:04
Size: 1201
Editor: HowardNoble
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2006-10-29 12:31:47
Size: 1208
Editor: HowardNoble
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
A case-study strategy ‘involves an empirical investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon within its real life context using multiple sources of evidence’ (Yin 1994). A case is studied in its own right within a specified ‘setting’; as Miles and Huberman note, ‘we cannot study individual cases devoid of their context in a way that a quantitative researcher often does’ (1994: 27). The case itself can be virtually anything: an individual person, a group, an institution, an innovation, a service, and so on. For instance in the CRT [[CRT.Report.Connecting_technology_and_university_teaching|Connecting technology to University Teaching Project]] the case was defined as a group of individuals within one HE institution. The group was a selection of university teachers, and the institution, the University of Oxford. In this sense the case has multiple components, supplying multiple sources of evidence to tell a story about that group. A case-study strategy ‘involves an empirical investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon within its real life context using multiple sources of evidence’ (Yin 1994). A case is studied in its own right within a specified ‘setting’; as Miles and Huberman note, ‘we cannot study individual cases devoid of their context in a way that a quantitative researcher often does’ (1994: 27). The case itself can be virtually anything: an individual person, a group, an institution, an innovation, a service, and so on. For instance in the CRT Report [:CRT.Report.Connecting technology and university teaching: Connecting technology and university teaching] the case was defined as a group of individuals within one HE institution. The group was a selection of university teachers, and the institution, the University of Oxford. In this sense the case has multiple components, supplying multiple sources of evidence to tell a story about that group.
Line 4: Line 4:
==Bibliography== == Bibliography ==
Line 6: Line 6:
Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. London, Sage.

Stake, R. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research, London, SAGE.

Yin, R. K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods. London, Sage.
 * Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. London, Sage.
 * Stake, R. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research, London, SAGE.
 * Yin, R. K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods. London, Sage.

A case-study strategy ‘involves an empirical investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon within its real life context using multiple sources of evidence’ (Yin 1994). A case is studied in its own right within a specified ‘setting’; as Miles and Huberman note, ‘we cannot study individual cases devoid of their context in a way that a quantitative researcher often does’ (1994: 27). The case itself can be virtually anything: an individual person, a group, an institution, an innovation, a service, and so on. For instance in the CRT Report [:CRT.Report.Connecting technology and university teaching: Connecting technology and university teaching] the case was defined as a group of individuals within one HE institution. The group was a selection of university teachers, and the institution, the University of Oxford. In this sense the case has multiple components, supplying multiple sources of evidence to tell a story about that group.

Bibliography

  • Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. London, Sage.

  • Stake, R. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research, London, SAGE.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods. London, Sage.

LTGPublicWiki: CRT_Case_Study_Guidelines (last edited 2013-05-20 11:29:48 by localhost)