Differences between revisions 4 and 8 (spanning 4 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2007-06-13 13:49:51 →
Size: 1840
Editor: AlexisOConnor
Comment: Moved stuff around and changed things.
← Revision 8 as of 2013-05-20 11:29:48 → ⇥
Size: 2328
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
#pragma section-numbers off
Line 5: Line 6:
This exercise is similar to the ["../PeerReview" first] peer-review exercise. However rather than a physical meeting we will be conducting a tele-conference on 13th June 2007. It is a ''triangular round-robin'' where each team reviews the work of another, within a triplet. We are ''reviewing'' the work of [http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning_framework/demo_designshare.html DesignShare]. In turn, we are being ''reviewed'' by [http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/projects/resourcebrowser/ ResourceBrowser]. This exercise is similar to the [[../PeerReview|first]] peer-review exercise. However rather than a physical meeting we will be conducting a tele-conference on 13th June 2007. It is a ''triangular round-robin'' where each team reviews the work of another, within a triplet. We are ''reviewing'' the work of [[http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning_framework/demo_designshare.html|DesignShare]]. In turn, we are being ''reviewed'' by [[http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/projects/resourcebrowser/|ResourceBrowser]]. (''NOTE: the wording in bold indicates points highlighted with respect to the first peer-review exercise.'').
Line 10: Line 11:
 * Good project [http://designshare.opendocument.net/Application/index.php?crumb=2&action=page&page=About+DesignShare web-site] which provides a nice introduction.  * Good project [[http://designshare.opendocument.net/Application/index.php?crumb=2&action=page&page=About+DesignShare|web-site]] which provides a nice introduction.
Line 13: Line 14:
 * Could not find a project blog - '''there is a project blog (albeit sparsely populated one)'''.  * Could not find a project blog - '''there is now a project blog (albeit sparsely populated one)'''.
Line 17: Line 18:
 * Whilst I (`AO'C`) could the project to build and run from a cvs checkout as an Eclipse workbench project, I couldn't get it to run by dropping the [http://www.reload.ac.uk/beta/OpenDock_Plugin.zip plugin] into a download of [http://www.reload.ac.uk Reload] (Ubuntu Linux 7.04 ''Feisty Fawn'').  * Whilst I (`AO'C`) could get the project to build and run from a cvs checkout as an Eclipse workbench project, I couldn't get it to run by dropping the [[http://www.reload.ac.uk/beta/OpenDock_Plugin.zip|plugin]] into a download of [[http://www.reload.ac.uk|Reload]] (Ubuntu Linux 7.04 ''Feisty Fawn'').
 * We suggested moving the location of the project web-site to a "nicer" location. It has moved to http://www.oyster-media.com/designshare/. If you go to http://www.oyster-media.com/ (the "root") you find a questionnaire. Just a bit disconcerting that's all. University branding would be nice ;-) .
Line 19: Line 21:
`AO'C` - Alexis O'Connor. ~- '''Footnotes''' -~

~- `AO'C` - Alexis O'Connor. -~

Frockle/PeerReview2

Introduction

This exercise is similar to the first peer-review exercise. However rather than a physical meeting we will be conducting a tele-conference on 13th June 2007. It is a triangular round-robin where each team reviews the work of another, within a triplet. We are reviewing the work of DesignShare. In turn, we are being reviewed by ResourceBrowser. (NOTE: the wording in bold indicates points highlighted with respect to the first peer-review exercise.).

Main Exercise: DesignShare (conducted on April 24th 2007)

Pluses

  • Good project web-site which provides a nice introduction.

  • Sensible code formatting and comments.

  • Being built as an Eclipse plugin, so effectively a standard build procedure (no scripts required) and then just Run As -> Eclipse Application to execute it.

  • Could not find a project blog - there is now a project blog (albeit sparsely populated one).

  • License is probably in the wrong place - should probably be placed at the top of the file above the package declaration. - this has been fixed.

Minuses

  • All the CVS commit messages are blank - helpful to have a bit more information, even if it's just "Added a bit more code ..." ;-) - this was highlighted in the previous exercise.

  • Whilst I (AO'C) could get the project to build and run from a cvs checkout as an Eclipse workbench project, I couldn't get it to run by dropping the plugin into a download of Reload (Ubuntu Linux 7.04 Feisty Fawn).

  • We suggested moving the location of the project web-site to a "nicer" location. It has moved to http://www.oyster-media.com/designshare/. If you go to http://www.oyster-media.com/ (the "root") you find a questionnaire. Just a bit disconcerting that's all. University branding would be nice ;-) .

Footnotes

AO'C - Alexis O'Connor.

LTGPublicWiki: Frockle/PeerReview2 (last edited 2013-05-20 11:29:48 by localhost)