Differences between revisions 1 and 2
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2007-04-27 12:12:13 →
Size: 1396
Editor: ColinTatham
Comment: Added initial list of tasks
← Revision 2 as of 2007-05-17 13:01:09 → ⇥
Size: 1452
Editor: ColinTatham
Comment: Added 'complete' comments to completed tasks
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 1. Get eProfile web service working with !TouchGraph client.
  * may need newer version of eProfile client code which allows connecting to web service rather than static XML file.
  * may be browser issues (Linux) with !TouchGraph and pop-ups.
 1. Get eProfile web service working with !TouchGraph client. COMPLETE
  * may need newer version of eProfile client code which allows connecting to web service rather than static XML file. COMPLETE
  * may be browser issues (Linux) with !TouchGraph and pop-ups. CONFIRMED, need to confirm with Essex

To Do list

To make sure we satisfy basic requirements of a demonstrator:

  1. Get eProfile web service working with TouchGraph client. COMPLETE

    • may need newer version of eProfile client code which allows connecting to web service rather than static XML file. COMPLETE
    • may be browser issues (Linux) with TouchGraph and pop-ups. CONFIRMED, need to confirm with Essex

  2. Write up difficulties encountered with:
    • SVN repository structure, code history.
    • deployment of web service (lack of build system, etc).
    • technical documentation of what web service does/how it works.
    • connecting client to web service (if any).

To satisfy Frockle objectives in the most basic way:

  1. Develop a WebLearn template to display/edit a profile via eProfile web service.

  2. Develop a modified version of the WebLearn search tool to search for MyWebLearn spaces.

  3. Add ability to view a FOAF network in WebLearn (starting in a user's personal space?)

  4. Add ability to view a user's profile in WebLearn after navigating FOAF network.

Other issues/tasks:

  1. SVN repository: Ideally we and Essex should use the same repository for work in progress, to avoid relying on periodic updates from Essex. Options are: both use main Essex one (branch for us), public SVN at SF, or current Essex one/OUCS one with full import? We can offer help with structuring/maintaining the repository, especially if it's at SF.

LTGPublicWiki: Frockle/ToDoList (last edited 2013-05-20 11:29:50 by localhost)