Differences between revisions 24 and 25
Revision 24 as of 2007-06-18 10:30:31
Size: 7781
Editor: LizMasterman
Comment:
Revision 25 as of 2009-08-10 09:02:36
Size: 0
Editor: LizMasterman
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
#pragma section-numbers off
[[TableOfContents]]
== About Thema ==
The Thema project is being carried out by the Learning Technologies Group within Oxford University Computing Services. It is funded from 1st March 2007 to 30th November 2008 by JISC (the Joint Information Systems Committee) and is one of eight projects in phase 2 of JISC’s [http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning_pedagogy/elp_learnerexperience.aspx Learner Experiences of E-learning Programme]. Each of these projects is exploring a different aspect of students' experience of computers and other digital technologies in their learning in a range of institutions and at different levels of post-compulsory education.

Thema focuses on the experiences of students on taught Master’s programmes, both in Oxford’s main collegiate University and its Department of Continuing Education. We believe that students at this level are of particular interest because of their heterogeneity in terms of, for example, age, educational history, life situation and IT skills. Moreover, a substantial number will be planning to embark on doctoral programmes and thus making the transition from taught to independent study.

Why Thema?
Thema is the Greek for "theme," of which we hope to elicit a large number during the course of the study. The full title of the project is "Thema: Exploring the experiences of Master’s students in technology-rich environments." However, we do not expect courses to make extensive use of technology. Rather, the "environments" of which we speak are those of the early 21st century in general, which offer both teachers and students a wide range of digital resources which they can use in their teaching and learning.

== Research questions ==
Starting from the assumption that students come to Oxford with an existing set of IT skills and technological tools at their disposal, which they have used in their previous studies and/or their personal and social lives, we want to investigate students' evolving experience of technology – both hardware and software – during their courses. Our key areas of interest are:

 1. Whether - and how - their use of such tools changes during their course, through contact with the tools provided by the University (e.g. the !WebLearn VLE or bibliographic software) and tools which they find out about in other ways (e.g. from fellow students or through their own discoveries).
 1. Whether teaching staff use technology in a way that students find motivating, and which they feel really benefits their learning.
 1. The extent to which students are using new "social software" such as blogs, wikis and Facebook, and whether they feel these tools might have a role to play in their studies.

Although Thema is part of a national programme, we expect our findings to yield substantial benefits within Oxford University, principally through identifying opportunities for more creative use of IT in teaching and learning and suggesting possible directions for the future development of WebLearn.

== Methodology ==
Our planned approach consists of a preliminary survey and a main study with four components:

 1. '''Baseline survey:''' Carry out a large-scale online quantitative survey of students in May-June 2007 to obtain a comprehensive snapshot of their current technology use, both in their studies and in their personal and social lives. This will provide a backdrop for the main study.
 1. '''Initial profile:''' At the start of the Academic Year 2007-8, survey all students in the identified cohorts in order to elicit data on, inter alia, their existing use of technology, and their expectations and intentions regarding the course and the role of technology in it.
 1. '''"Concurrent" data:''' During the course, invite students to contribute general reflections and/or snapshots of usage that they consider to be significant or memorable.
 1. '''Reflective survey:''' After 6-7 months, conduct a "reflective" online survey to capture students’ experiences, their use of the tools and the extent to which their expectations and intentions have been realised.
 1. '''Case studies:''' Follow up the second survey with a small number of interviews, from which we will compile 10-12 case studies, also drawing on data from the surveys and contributions made by the students during the course.
== Project team ==
||<style="width: 15%">Dr Liz Masterman ||Liz is the Project Manager. She oversees the day-to-day apportioning of the work across the range of skills in the team and liaise with other OUCS managers where appropriate to ensure that the project runs smoothly alongside other commitments.||
||Jane Shuyska ||Jane completed the MSc in E-learning in the Department of Education in 2006. She will complete the MSc in Educational Research Methods in September 2007 and will then start her doctoral research into E-learning. Within the Thema project, Jane is working on data collection and analysis, and will also provide input into the research design. ||
||Peter Robinson ||Peter is Manager of Learning Technology Services in OUCS. He is helping to support Thema and embed the results within the LTG’s development activities. ||
||Kate Lindsay ||Kate will be available for approximately 20 days over the course of the project to provide input on methodological issues. ||
||Dr Chris Davies||Chris is Course Director of the MSc in E-learning in the Department of Education. He will contribute up to 5 days through the life of the project, acting chiefly as a liaison between the project team and course directors of the Master’s courses in the department. ||


'''Advisory Group:'''[[BR]] Dr Chris Davies[[BR]] Dr Paul Davis: Manager, LTG[[BR]] Marion Manton: Senior Manager, Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning Unit, Oxford University Department of Continuing Education[[BR]] Peter Robinson[[BR]] Dr Paul Trafford: Learning Technologies Group, OUCS[[BR]]

== Project news ==
||<style="width: 10%">'''2007'''||||
||15th June||We have now closed the baseline survey and drawn our winner. Once we have "cleaned up" the data we expect to have approximately 1100 usable responses - way more than our expectations!||
||13th June||A very productive day with the other projects at a programme meeting to discuss methodology at the University of Hertfordshire||
||30th May||Meeting with Ellen Lessner & Greg Benfield from the Support & Synthesis project: Some searching questions but much useful food for thought! ||
||21st May||We have released the baseline survey to the university via the Webmail news page and a Facebook flyer (a first for an OUCS project?)||
||21st May||We have released the baseline survey to the university via the Webmail news page and a Facebook flyer (a first for an OUCS project?)||
||9th May||The MSc E-learning students in the Department of Education piloted the baseline survey for us - and it has undergone considerable improvement as a result. (Thanks also to staff within OUCS who also reviewed the final version and found a few more howlers!)||
||30th April||We submitted the detailed project plan to JISC.||
||10th April||The project has received approval from the University's Ethics Committee.||
||29th March||Liz and Pete attended the initial programme workshop at JISC's London offices, where we met representatives from the seven other projects in the programme.||
||1st March||First day of the project! (A rather quiet one, though...)||

== Forthcoming events ==
||<style="width: 10%">'''2007'''||||
||27th June||JISC E-learning Pedagogy Experts’ Meeting, Bristol||
||16th Oct||Programme meeting on data analysis, Open University||
||<style="width: 10%">'''2008'''||||
||27th Feb||Programme meeting, University of Edinburgh||