|
Size: 1959
Comment:
|
Size: 3358
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 25: | Line 25: |
| * The banner title is just part of the decoration unless I look for the title. I could see from the list what it was though. * Like the left-nav, and the way it expands. * Found the text in the middle clunky, not aesthetically in keeping with the rest. * Content immediately interesting, and found something straight away. * Looked at homepage and at BROWSE BY DATE, which he did not remember seeing in other websites * Good use of images, which is appealing. * Clicked on THE COLLECTIONS link and browsed a bit. Also checked the FAVORITES page. Found the design good. * Looked at the main page only * In photographs in top margin, nothing that immediately strikes as being 'WW1' * Just looked at the first page. * Did not click on any links. * Images do not strike you as being related to the 1st world war as soon as you seen them * Very visul and attractive * Like the banner but simple text catalogue lets it down a bit * More info about the project on the main page. * Links horizontal and not vertical. * More info: i.e. Rather than "The Collections", we should be more specific |
|
| Line 26: | Line 43: |
| * Provide pictorial and text that communicate very quickly what the archive is about Note: this question is not regarded as very important at this stage since the project has not got round to implementing the finer details of the site at this stage. |
|
| Line 28: | Line 47: |
| attachment:Q6.jpeg attachment:Q7.jpeg |
|
| Line 47: | Line 68: |
| ||<tablewidth="858px" tableheight="607px" tablestyle="">'''Id''' ||'''Requirement''' ||'''Desirability (d)''' ||'''Effort (e)''' ||'''Score (d x e)''' ||'''Notes''' || | ||<tablewidth="858px" tableheight="607px">'''Id''' ||'''Requirement''' ||'''Desirability (d)''' ||'''Effort (e)''' ||'''Score (d x e)''' ||'''Notes''' || |
Overview of methodology
Phase 1: May 2008
- Conducted interviews with close project collaborators
- The survey guided interviewee through 6 scenarios and asked for constructive feedback on the main features of the WW1 website
- Interviewees filled out survey and 'thought aloud' so that two interviewers could take notes.
- The interviewees actions with the computer while undertaking the scenarios was recorded as movie files (screen capture)
- Survey attached here: attachment:WW1SurveyApril2008
Phase 2: June 2008
TBC
Phase 3: October2 2008
TBC
Findings: Phase 1
First impressions
Quantitative
attachment:Q4.jpeg
Qualitative
- The banner title is just part of the decoration unless I look for the title. I could see from the list what it was though.
- Like the left-nav, and the way it expands.
- Found the text in the middle clunky, not aesthetically in keeping with the rest.
- Content immediately interesting, and found something straight away.
- Looked at homepage and at BROWSE BY DATE, which he did not remember seeing in other websites
- Good use of images, which is appealing.
- Clicked on THE COLLECTIONS link and browsed a bit. Also checked the FAVORITES page. Found the design good.
- Looked at the main page only
- In photographs in top margin, nothing that immediately strikes as being 'WW1'
- Just looked at the first page.
- Did not click on any links.
- Images do not strike you as being related to the 1st world war as soon as you seen them
- Very visul and attractive
- Like the banner but simple text catalogue lets it down a bit
- More info about the project on the main page.
- Links horizontal and not vertical.
- More info: i.e. Rather than "The Collections", we should be more specific
Requirements statements
- Provide pictorial and text that communicate very quickly what the archive is about
Note: this question is not regarded as very important at this stage since the project has not got round to implementing the finer details of the site at this stage.
Searching for resources
Quantitative
attachment:Q6.jpeg attachment:Q7.jpeg
Qualitative
Requirements statements
Printing
Quantitative
Qualitative
Requirements statements
Favourites
Quantitative
Qualitative
Requirements statements
Advanced search
Quantitative
Qualitative
Requirements statements
Compound objects
Quantitative
Qualitative
Requirements statements
Analysis
Id |
Requirement |
Desirability (d) |
Effort (e) |
Score (d x e) |
Notes |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|